<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Just I usually prefer using fixed field lengths as queries tend to be
> significantly faster. Also, you can use them in indexes.
You are making assumptions based on other databases that are not
relevant to Postgres.
> And it leads me to wonder how you would represen
x27;This is a space');
>
> for perhaps some sort of formatting or something otherwise.
>
> I'll try and find something in the postgres documentation to disable
> this then I guess.
>
>
> -Jeff
>
> Original Message
> Subject: Re: [JDBC
nsert into names values(1,'This is a space');
for perhaps some sort of formatting or something otherwise.
I'll try and find something in the postgres documentation to disable this
then I guess.
-Jeff
Original Message ----
Subject: Re: [JDBC] Using char fields with
> I can easily get around this using .trim(), but I'm wondering if that
> should be in the jdbc driver itself (as I'll have to go through a bit of
> code looking for string values being returned).
char() is fixed length, varchar isn't.
>
> Or is this something in the database software itself th
I'm not a JDBC expert, but this is pretty much the way I'd expect it to
work. If you a have fixed length field, then the field should return that
many characters. The varchar implies it's variable length, so trailing
spaces would then not be included.
David
---(end of