,
--Barry
Ned Wolpert wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Humm... are you saying that the class PostgresqlDataSource doesn't work? I
guess I'm not sure what doesn't work with the driver. (Course, I've been
using
PoolMan as the datasource to wrap the postgresql
if I came off that way.
Virtually,
Ned Wolpert [EMAIL PROTECTED]
D08C2F45: 28E7 56CB 58AC C622 5A51 3C42 8B2B 2739 D08C 2F45
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org
driver. I think the website should have the default one, and the j2ee
(jdk1.2e+) one available. Thoughts?
Virtually,
Ned Wolpert [EMAIL PROTECTED]
D08C2F45: 28E7 56CB 58AC C622 5A51 3C42 8B2B 2739 D08C 2F45
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see
the startup of ant using the -D flag. (set the ANT_OPTS var to
-Dbuild.compiler=jikes in your environment before running ant)
Virtually,
Ned Wolpert [EMAIL PROTECTED]
D08C2F45: 28E7 56CB 58AC C622 5A51 3C42 8B2B 2739 D08C 2F45
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment
a) vote on it (Least the CVS
committers should) or b) leave it for now. Either way, I'm going to stay out
of this discussion for now.
Virtually,
Ned Wolpert [EMAIL PROTECTED]
D08C2F45: 28E7 56CB 58AC C622 5A51 3C42 8B2B 2739 D08C 2F45
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux
before
Visual Basic. :-) [Corba? What's Corba? CICS anyone?]
I guess standards are what I use, and everyone else is violating them. ;-)
[Sorry, couldn't resist...]
Virtually,
Ned Wolpert [EMAIL PROTECTED]
D08C2F45: 28E7 56CB 58AC C622 5A51 3C42 8B2B 2739 D08C 2F45
-BEGIN PGP
on', we don't expect individuals to build the JDBC
driver on their own, but use binaries, than simplfying the build procedure by
only using make should be fine.)
Virtually,
Ned Wolpert [EMAIL PROTECTED]
D08C2F45: 28E7 56CB 58AC C622 5A51 3C42 8B2B 2739 D08C 2F45
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE
] 3 errors
BUILD FAILED
/home/wolpert/test/configTest/build.xml:35: Compile failed, messages should
have been provided.
Total time: 4 seconds
[wolpert@wolpert configTest]$ echo $?
1
[wolpert@wolpert configTest]$
Virtually,
Ned Wolpert [EMAIL PROTECTED]
D08C2F45: 28E7 56CB 58AC C622 5A51
, this doesn't work
with Ant, but it's trivial with GNU make.
Actually, I think you can, if I understand the question. Simply have multiple
targets in the build process, one per driver type. Each target builds the
driver if and-only-if the needed classes are loaded.
Virtually,
Ned Wolpert [EMAIL PROTECTED
the
jdbc JAR ourselves.
True. I was really looking at it from those who wanted to build the jar from
source. If we make the jarfile available from the website, that's good for the
PostgreSQL releases, but it may not help those who want/need the JDBC driver
updated from CVS.
Virtually,
Ned Wolpert
I meant to send this to the group...
-FW: [EMAIL PROTECTED]-
Date: Fri, 19 Oct 2001 10:45:43 -0700 (MST)
Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
From: Ned Wolpert [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Barry Lind [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [JDBC] [PATCHES] Ant configuration
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE
.
Works for me. As I mentioned in my last email, I'm easy about this one. As
long as I can build it in Linux/UNIX, I'm happy. Its an added benefit to
the postgresql community that it can be built on Windows and Mac.
Virtually,
Ned Wolpert [EMAIL PROTECTED]
D08C2F45: 28E7 56CB 58AC C622 5A51
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I like your function name, get_last_returned_oid(). That works for me.
On 23-Aug-2001 Tom Lane wrote:
Ned Wolpert [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Should the backend support the function getLastInsertedOID() or even
getLastInsertedPrimaryKey
,
--Barry
Ned Wolpert wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Ok, so you're not opposed to the idea then, just the syntax. Does anyone
oppose having this concept in the JDBC driver? And what syntax is
acceptable?
Could we just do
'select getInsertedOID()'
which would break
-tree geared for 7.2 all-along?
On 21-Aug-2001 Tom Lane wrote:
Ned Wolpert [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
(You patched this about two months ago.) Specifically, the 1.11 version of
jdbc2/PreparedStatment.java file has the patch, but the 7.1.3 released does
not. How do we propragate patches
on the next call, which would
be trapped by the statment object to return a resultset with the oid of
the last inserted oid.
3) or, someother way that where one doesn't need direct access to method
calls to get 'getInsertedOID()', but indirect ones.
Thoughts?
Virtually,
Ned Wolpert
the RETURNING clause is more work... and I would
like to help out on that for 7.3.
On 21-Aug-2001 Tom Lane wrote:
Ned Wolpert [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
1) Being able to use the RETURNING clause in prepared statements, like
this
INSERT INTO tableName (key1,...)
VALUES
commented on. Now that I remember, I thought that the
RETURNING clause was being implemented. I didn't realize there wasn't
agreement on it.
I need to pay more attention to what I write. :-)
Virtually,
Ned Wolpert [EMAIL PROTECTED]
D08C2F45: 28E7 56CB 58AC C622 5A51 3C42 8B2B 2739 D08C 2F45
getInsertedOID() of course...
On 21-Aug-2001 Tom Lane wrote:
Ned Wolpert [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
What about the 'select @@last_oid' to make the getInsertedOID() call
available even when the driver is wrapped by a pooling manager?
How do people feel about this?
Yech. At least
,
Ned Wolpert [EMAIL PROTECTED]
D08C2F45: 28E7 56CB 58AC C622 5A51 3C42 8B2B 2739 D08C 2F45
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 4: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
release?
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.0.4 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Public key at http://www.keyserver.net
iD8DBQE68ZjfiysnOdCML0URAnAkAJ4h2r21+uvdZzw14Prmy8SgvqJs2QCeMMN8
YpwRmYJkfJdzZnkpqTLfI3Q=
=PqCG
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
--
Virtually,
Ned Wolpert [EMAIL PROTECTED
$_gett_inserted_oid) Does that make sense to others? (Kinda like what
oracle's and other jdbc driver do.)
Date: Mon, 30 Apr 2001 14:00:32 -0400 (EDT)
From: Ned Wolpert [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Folks-
Got a question about using the PostgreSQL JDBC driver with pooling.
Using 7.1, I noticed the extra
22 matches
Mail list logo
