JDBC1 patch attached. I don't have a JDBC1 environment (that I know of)
so I haven't even compiled this... sorry :(
I also attach a very small patch to correct my email address in the JDBC
2 patch. Apply it or not, it's not important, I just noticed it.
Thanks again
Cheers
Mark
> I have applied
> The patch is missing the corresponding fix for
> jdbc1/DatabaseMetaData.java. Can you resubmit the patch with a fix for
> both occurances of the problem? Otherwise the fix looks fine.
I have applied the jdbc2 version. It would be nice to have a jdbc1
version too. Thanks.
--
Bruce Momj
The patch is missing the corresponding fix for
jdbc1/DatabaseMetaData.java. Can you resubmit the patch with a fix for
both occurances of the problem? Otherwise the fix looks fine.
thanks,
--Barry
Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Here is a patch for DatabaseMetaData to show precision properly. It is
Patch applied. Thanks. If you can send a jdbc1 version, that would be
great.
---
> Here is a patch for DatabaseMetaData to show precision properly. It is
> from Mark Lillywhite. I am adding to the patch queue.
>
> --
Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> + tuple[8] =
> +Integer.toString((attypmod & 0x) - VARHDRSZ).getBytes();
In the backend sources, we subtract VARHDRSZ *first* and then AND with .
Not sure if this will ever yield a different result, but I'd say it
should be
Here is a patch for DatabaseMetaData to show precision properly. It is
from Mark Lillywhite. I am adding to the patch queue.
--
Bruce Momjian| http://candle.pha.pa.us
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Bl
> Attached is a unified diff to DatabaseMetadata from the jdbc2 interface.
> It fixes a bug where the metadata does not include the scale/precision
> of the database columns.
>
> We have been using this patch successfully for about 2 years, it would
> be great to finally get it into the sources.
