Peter T Mount wrote:
> Quoting Antonio Fiol <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> > Joseph Shraibman wrote:
> >
> > > jdbc version don't follow postgres versions, so the jdbc drivers from
> > > the 7.1 codebase should work with a 7.0 server. Provided there
> > aren't any bugs in those jdbc drivers, of course
Quoting Antonio Fiol <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Joseph Shraibman wrote:
>
> > jdbc version don't follow postgres versions, so the jdbc drivers from
> > the 7.1 codebase should work with a 7.0 server. Provided there
> aren't any bugs in those jdbc drivers, of course. Why are you using 7.0
> when 7.
Joseph Shraibman wrote:
> jdbc version don't follow postgres versions, so the jdbc drivers from
> the 7.1 codebase should work with a 7.0 server. Provided there aren't
> any bugs in those jdbc drivers, of course. Why are you using 7.0 when
> 7.0.3 is out? I think some of the timestamp problems
jdbc version don't follow postgres versions, so the jdbc drivers from
the 7.1 codebase should work with a 7.0 server. Provided there aren't
any bugs in those jdbc drivers, of course. Why are you using 7.0 when
7.0.3 is out? I think some of the timestamp problems were fixed in
7.0.3.
Antonio Fi
