[JDBC] Re: Patch to remove connection hook and JDK 1.3 dependencies

2001-07-06 Thread Joseph Shraibman
Barry Lind wrote: > > Attached is a patch to remove the ConnectionHook functionality and thus > the JDK 1.3 dependency. For a further explanation see my posting to the > JDBC list on Friday, explaining why this is being done. > I don't see any post on Friday. Why is this being done? Now I'll

Re: [JDBC] Re: Patch to remove connection hook and JDK 1.3 dependencies

2001-07-06 Thread Bruce Momjian
> Barry Lind wrote: > > > > Attached is a patch to remove the ConnectionHook functionality and thus > > the JDK 1.3 dependency. For a further explanation see my posting to the > > JDBC list on Friday, explaining why this is being done. > > > I don't see any post on Friday. Why is this being do

Re: [JDBC] Re: Patch to remove connection hook and JDK 1.3 dependencies

2001-07-06 Thread Joseph Shraibman
Bruce Momjian wrote: > > > Barry Lind wrote: > > > > > > Attached is a patch to remove the ConnectionHook functionality and thus > > > the JDK 1.3 dependency. For a further explanation see my posting to the > > > JDBC list on Friday, explaining why this is being done. > > > > > I don't see any p

Re: [JDBC] Re: Patch to remove connection hook and JDK 1.3 dependencies

2001-07-06 Thread Bruce Momjian
> > The consensus was that the function didn't work or wasn't needed. We > > can always re-add it. I will wait for a discussion. > > > If it doesn't work that's one thing but I think it is needed. Whenever > I shut down my java programs I get 'pq_recvbuf: unexpected EOF on client > connection

[JDBC] DatabaseMetaData.getCatalogs()

2001-07-06 Thread jason
Hi, Is there a reason why getCatalogs() is not supported in the JDBC driver? First of all, what is the definition of a catalog? The MySQL JDBC driver simply returns a list of the databases so a simple select datname from pg_database; would do the same thing. However there is probably a reason