Barry Lind wrote:
>
> Attached is a patch to remove the ConnectionHook functionality and thus
> the JDK 1.3 dependency. For a further explanation see my posting to the
> JDBC list on Friday, explaining why this is being done.
>
I don't see any post on Friday. Why is this being done? Now I'll
> Barry Lind wrote:
> >
> > Attached is a patch to remove the ConnectionHook functionality and thus
> > the JDK 1.3 dependency. For a further explanation see my posting to the
> > JDBC list on Friday, explaining why this is being done.
> >
> I don't see any post on Friday. Why is this being do
Bruce Momjian wrote:
>
> > Barry Lind wrote:
> > >
> > > Attached is a patch to remove the ConnectionHook functionality and thus
> > > the JDK 1.3 dependency. For a further explanation see my posting to the
> > > JDBC list on Friday, explaining why this is being done.
> > >
> > I don't see any p
> > The consensus was that the function didn't work or wasn't needed. We
> > can always re-add it. I will wait for a discussion.
> >
> If it doesn't work that's one thing but I think it is needed. Whenever
> I shut down my java programs I get 'pq_recvbuf: unexpected EOF on client
> connection
Hi,
Is there a reason why getCatalogs() is not supported in the JDBC driver? First of all,
what is the definition of a catalog? The MySQL JDBC driver simply returns a list of
the databases so a simple select datname from pg_database; would do the same thing.
However there is probably a reason