I'm that person. I'm not trying to do anything convoluted. ;-)
I have a schema & data from Oracle that uses a 'fake' boolean column.
(Stupid oracle doesn't support type boolean afaik - uses number). I
find the easiest way to adapt the schema & data to postgresql is to
*not* convert the 'fake' b
TED]>
To: Glenn R. Kronschnabl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: [JDBC] A Bug Fix - Is this a real bug? Has this already been fixed?
Date: 13 Sep 2001 11:46:50 -0500
I would ask this in jdbc. I see jdbc1 has some test for 't' and 'T' and
'1', but not in jdbc2.
