[JDBC] Bug Report
I have a timestamp field called created. I have a result set called rs. When I do rs.getDate(created), I get a numberformat exception. I did not get this exception using driver 7.0. After I upgraded to 7.1, I get this exception. Xu Zhou (Danny) Tyco Fire Security Services 4131 Northgate Blvd Sacramento, CA 95834 USA Phone: +1 916-569-3145 Fax:+1 916-565-2006 E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 5: Have you checked our extensive FAQ? http://www.postgresql.org/users-lounge/docs/faq.html
[JDBC] Fw: JDBC Bug Report
Hi guys, this has been sent direct to me. Peter --- Hi, I have a table with those column name position and local and I use the JDBC for PostgreSQL as you provided. But when I run the my Java Application. I t prompts up SQLException: parser: parse error at or near position(local) at org.postgresql.Connection.ExecSQL(Connection.java:393) at org.postgresql.jdbc2.Statement.execute(Statement.java:273) at org.postgresql.jdbc2.Statement.executeUpdate(Statement.java:73) at org.postgresql.jdbc2.PreparedStatement.executeUpdate (PreparedStatement.java:126) I think this is a bug since as I just change the field name in the table and recompile my application and can run with no error. Best regards, Leo email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 4: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
Re: [JDBC] Bug-report (was: JDBC driver in pgsql 7.1 build problem)
On Thu, May 03, 2001 at 11:48:34PM +0200, Rolf Schillinger wrote:
Hi again,
it`s now offical, I found a bug in JDBC driver in pgsql 7.1 ;)
:)
I had the following problems:
/usr/local/jakarta-ant-1.3/bin//ant -buildfile ../../../build.xml
...
expected
[javac] return ${major};
...
when using
JDK:
java version 1.3.0
Java(TM) 2 Runtime Environment, Standard Edition (build
Blackdown-1.3.0-RC1)
Java HotSpot(TM) Client VM (build Blackdown-1.3.0-RC1, mixed mode)
Ant:
Ant version 1.3 compiled on March 2 2001
Postgresql:
As stated above: 7.1
To narrow the problem...
Has anybody had success compiling unpatched 7.1 JDBC driver
with JDK1.3 and Ant 1.2/1.3? If not, could this patch be
applied? Ant 1.4 betas seem to be ok.
--
marko
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your
message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
Re: [JDBC] Bug-report (was: JDBC driver in pgsql 7.1 build problem)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Date: Fri, 4 May 2001 19:26:48 +0200 From: Marko Kreen [EMAIL PROTECTED] Has anybody had success compiling unpatched 7.1 JDBC driver with JDK1.3 and Ant 1.2/1.3? If not, could this patch be applied? Ant 1.4 betas seem to be ok. Yes. I could compile 7.1 with ant 1.3 without a problem. -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.0.4 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Public key at http://www.keyserver.net iD8DBQE68vCUiysnOdCML0URAhaFAJwPk4muzSP6c5b+HCfZL/3N+KBv/ACdGke9 eFvhpOC1sWEeXmw9ozLfCR8= =rg36 -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- Virtually, Ned Wolpert [EMAIL PROTECTED] D08C2F45: 28E7 56CB 58AC C622 5A51 3C42 8B2B 2739 D08C 2F45 ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 4: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
Re: [JDBC] Bug-report (was: JDBC driver in pgsql 7.1 build problem)
On Fri, May 04, 2001 at 09:16:38PM +0300, Ned Wolpert wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Date: Fri, 4 May 2001 19:26:48 +0200 From: Marko Kreen [EMAIL PROTECTED] Has anybody had success compiling unpatched 7.1 JDBC driver with JDK1.3 and Ant 1.2/1.3? If not, could this patch be applied? Ant 1.4 betas seem to be ok. Yes. I could compile 7.1 with ant 1.3 without a problem. And Sun's JDK 1.3? -- marko ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 5: Have you checked our extensive FAQ? http://www.postgresql.org/users-lounge/docs/faq.html
