[JDBC] Re: JDBC changes for 7.2... some questions...

2001-08-23 Thread Barry Lind
Ned, I would only agree to this functionality if it where a backend function. By putting it in the front end, you now need to front end to understand the special function. (And then you we are likely going to have requests that this special function be available in all the front ends

[JDBC] Re: JDBC changes for 7.2... some questions...

2001-08-22 Thread Barry Lind
I am assuming that this would be a new function in the server. Therefore this wouldn't be jdbc specific and would be available to all client interfaces. I don't see what this really has to do with JDBC. thanks, --Barry Ned Wolpert wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1

[JDBC] Re: JDBC changes for 7.2... some questions...

2001-08-22 Thread Ned Wolpert
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Actually, it's not a new function on the server... I'm just trying to find a way to access the getInsertedOID() method in the statement object without having direct access to the statement object. (My use-case is when the JDBC driver is wrapped in a

Re: [JDBC] Re: JDBC changes for 7.2... some questions...

2001-08-22 Thread Peter Wiley
What's your thoughts? Do you see the need for the functionality? Do you have a solution that I need? Definitely need the functionality. It's one of the things holding up me porting an Informix system. Laziness is a bigger holdup of course - the Informix system is so bulletproof and I'm