(Re: [PATCHES] Patch for jdbc2
ResultSet.java)
> On Thu, 06 Sep 2001 14:30:49 -0400, you wrote:
> >Ultimately it's the committer's responsibility
> >to have confidence that the patch he applies is good; if he doesn't
> >feel competent to check it himself, he sh
> Thanks for the votes of confidence. I am willing to take on the
> responsibility if the core committee agrees.
Well, actually, I was only speaking for myself, not for all of core, but
I hope they will agree this is a good idea.
--
Bruce Momjian| http://candle.pha.
> Thanks for the votes of confidence. I am willing to take on the
> responsibility if the core committee agrees.
>
Yes, we do. We don't know Java very well and are struggling. It would
be nice to have someone who actually know the language applying the
patches. :-)
--
Bruce Momjian
Thanks for the votes of confidence. I am willing to take on the
responsibility if the core committee agrees.
thanks,
--Barry
Rene Pijlman wrote:
> On 06 Sep 2001 14:18:09 +0200, Gunnar Rønning wrote:
>
>>* Tom Lane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>| Of these #3 seems like the solution that will e
: [PATCHES] Patch for jdbc2
ResultSet.java)
> On Thu, 06 Sep 2001 14:30:49 -0400, you wrote:
> >Ultimately it's the committer's responsibility
> >to have confidence that the patch he applies is good; if he doesn't
> >feel competent to check it himself, he shoul
> On Thu, 06 Sep 2001 14:30:49 -0400, you wrote:
> >Ultimately it's the committer's responsibility
> >to have confidence that the patch he applies is good; if he doesn't
> >feel competent to check it himself, he should call for more reviewers.
> >If he does feel sure about it, there's no need for
* Tom Lane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
|
| Of these #3 seems like the solution that will emerge in the long term
| anyway; but do we have candidate patch-meisters now?
|
| Comments, better ideas, nominations, volunteers?
I would like to nominate Barry Lind as he has been doing great work for a
l
