Bruce Momjian [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
! where reltype not in
('v','c') and
Surely you meant relkind. Also, there is no 'c' relkind; perhaps you
meant 's'? I think v,s,t are all relkinds to exclude here.
regards,
Tom Lane wrote:
Bruce Momjian [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
! where reltype not in
('v','c') and
Surely you meant relkind. Also, there is no 'c' relkind; perhaps you
meant 's'? I think v,s,t are all relkinds to exclude here.
Yes, sorry,
Tom Lane wrote:
Bruce Momjian [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Are these illustrating a problem with the function definition, or is it
happening because it is the first time we are calling the same function
with one and more than one parameter?
The function definition is broken. While it could
OK, change made and applied.
---
Tom Lane wrote:
Bruce Momjian [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Tom Lane wrote:
I think v,s,t are all relkinds to exclude here.
Is 't' for toast tables? If so, we should allow 't', no? I
Bruce Momjian [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Tom, how do I pass PG_FUNCTION_ARGS to another function, while adding a
new parameter?
I wouldn't. Do the PG_GETARGS in the wrapper, and have the called
function take a normal C parameter list.
regards, tom lane
Tom Lane wrote:
Bruce Momjian [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Tom, how do I pass PG_FUNCTION_ARGS to another function, while adding a
new parameter?
I wouldn't. Do the PG_GETARGS in the wrapper, and have the called
function take a normal C parameter list.
So I need to wrappers for each
Bruce Momjian wrote:
Tom Lane wrote:
Bruce Momjian [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Tom, how do I pass PG_FUNCTION_ARGS to another function, while adding a
new parameter?
I wouldn't. Do the PG_GETARGS in the wrapper, and have the called
function take a normal C parameter list.
So I
contraints - constraints
Index: release.sgml
===
RCS file: /home/rbt/work/postgresql/cvs/pgsql-server/doc/src/sgml/release.sgml,v
retrieving revision 1.202
diff -c -r1.202 release.sgml
*** release.sgml 25 Jul 2003 09:00:17 - 1.202
