On Tue, 2003-11-11 at 23:46, Tom Lane wrote:
Bruce Momjian [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Is this to be applied to CVS HEAD?
It sounded like large portions were still at the request-for-comment
stage...
It can be applied to -HEAD without breaking anything or backtracking in
feature set (that I
Christopher,
On Tue, Nov 11, 2003 at 11:14:44PM -0500, Bruce Momjian wrote:
Patch applied to CVS HEAD and 7.4CVS. Thanks.
Christopher Kings-Lynne wrote:
[snip]
Is that README included with the cygwin package, Jason? Because I
couldn't find it in mine...?
Yes, it is currently located
Rod Taylor writes:
ALTER TABLE tab ADD COLUMN col DEFAULT 3, ADD CHECK (anothercol 3);
The above combinational syntax is commented out in gram.y. The
support framework is used in both the above and below items, but
arbitrary statements probably have some issues --
On Wed, 2003-11-12 at 14:02, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
Rod Taylor writes:
ALTER TABLE tab ADD COLUMN col DEFAULT 3, ADD CHECK (anothercol 3);
I think it's perfectly fine to write two separate ALTER TABLE statements.
No need to introduce this nonstandard syntax.
Yes, it is certainly fine to
Bruce Momjian wrote:
Is there a TODO here?
I'm just evaluating the performances
of two version the one proposed by
Neil and the one in a stl::list fashion.
Tom suggested also to see if is the
case to implement the function size()
constant time or not.
Regards
Gaetano Mendola.
OK, here's a final tweak then.
Chris
Jason Tishler wrote:
Christopher,
On Tue, Nov 11, 2003 at 11:14:44PM -0500, Bruce Momjian wrote:
Patch applied to CVS HEAD and 7.4CVS. Thanks.
Christopher Kings-Lynne wrote:
[snip]
Is that README included with the cygwin package, Jason? Because I
What's become of initdb's initial note about who you are?
$ initdb
The files belonging to this database system will be owned by user postgres.
This user must also own the server process.
... etc etc...
The first two lines of printout don't seem to be in the highly
compatible C version.
Apologies. Here's the patch. There may be other very minor differences
in wording, too. But if that's all I missed I won't think I did too
badly :-)
cheers
andrew
Tom Lane wrote:
What's become of initdb's initial note about who you are?
$ initdb
The files belonging to this database system
OK, this works.
cheers
andrew
Andrew Dunstan wrote:
ARRGGHH! It has a typo!. new patch shortly.
Andrew Dunstan wrote:
Apologies. Here's the patch. There may be other very minor
differences in wording, too. But if that's all I missed I won't think
I did too badly :-)
cheers
andrew
Tom
