Dear Bruce,
# [PATCHES] notice about costly ri checks (2), Fabien COELHO
This one which appears on the web page can also be removed,
It is also replaced by version 4.
Sorry again for the inconvenience, have a nice day,
--
Fabien Coelho - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---(end of
Patch applied. Thanks.
---
Claudio Natoli wrote:
Fixes recent changes to test. For immediate application.
[Note: int8-exp-three-digits.out needs the same treatment]
Will review recent changes for float4/8 and
Dear Bruce,
It is in the queue because I need that narrative for the commit
messase.
Ok, I get the point.
I should have made a fully standalone version with all comments repeated.
Thanks, have a nice day,
--
Fabien Coelho - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---(end of
Andrew Dunstan [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Tom Lane wrote:
Has any of this discussion taken into account the fact that a
querystring may contain multiple commands?
What does the parser do if one of the statements has an error and the
others are OK?
The whole thing is rejected. This is just
Tom Lane wrote:
The current definition of log_statement has no problem because we print
the whole string, once, before parsing starts. If you put a printout
into the per-parse-tree loop then I think you are going to get multiple
printouts of the same string.
I didn't intend to - I intended to
I believe that the attached patch may solve this setlocale() problem,
but I do not have a Windows box handy on which to test it. Can somebody
who does please try and let us know the results?
thanks
andrew
Andrew Dunstan wrote:
the answer is very probably here:
Andrew Dunstan wrote:
It does print it. In fact the example I gave below which is from a
real trace shows it being printed. It is just printed after the error
message rather than before.
You solution doesn't appear to address the problem of what to do if
they ask for only DDL and
Tom Lane wrote:
Andrew Dunstan [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Tom Lane wrote:
Has any of this discussion taken into account the fact that a
querystring may contain multiple commands?
What does the parser do if one of the statements has an error and the
others are OK?
The whole thing is
Bruce Momjian wrote:
Well, if that is the question, then I don't want to reorder the query
printout from the error.
OK. I'll let someone else do it. I have no need for it. Forget I spoke.
cheers
andrew
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 8: explain
