Alvaro, is this ready to be applied?
---
Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> Hackers,
>
> This patch adds subtransaction support into the storage manager. Files
> created or dropped inside a subtransaction are correctly dealt with at
Alvaro, where are we on this patch. I think the suggestion was to
throw FATAL rather than add a new error level.
Is this ready to be applied?
---
Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 19, 2004 at 11:13:35AM -0400, Alvaro He
Your patch has been added to the PostgreSQL unapplied patches list at:
http://momjian.postgresql.org/cgi-bin/pgpatches
I will try to apply it within the next 48 hours.
I will probably hold it in the queue until Tom returns.
--
I assume we want to integrate our own timezone library into PostgreSQL.
We have talked about it for a few releases, and Magnus has done it for
us because Win32 needs it for pre-1970 dates.
The patch to PostgreSQL is 100 lines of diff, and the changes to Olson's
timezone library is 100 lines of d
PostgreSQL Bugs List wrote:
>
> The following bug has been logged online:
>
> Bug reference: 1134
> Logged by: Fabien COELHO
>
> Email address: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> PostgreSQL version: 7.5 Dev
>
> Operating system: any
>
> Description:ALTER USER ... RENAME breaks
Fabien COELHO wrote:
>
> > The oid's you chose were fine.
>
> > I updated the system catalog version number, and added prototype for
> > these functions.
>
> Ok, in "acl.h" and "catversion.h".
Right.
> I'm considering sending some patch for the documentation, although there
> is no real docume
> The oid's you chose were fine.
> I updated the system catalog version number, and added prototype for
> these functions.
Ok, in "acl.h" and "catversion.h".
I'm considering sending some patch for the documentation, although there
is no real documentation about the aclitem type in the doc tree.
Michiel Ephraim wrote:
> On Tuesday 20 April 2004 00:32, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > Michiel Ephraim wrote:
> > > dear hackers-win32 list,
> > >
> > > When building today's CVS version for win32, i found a few little things
> > > which stopped a clean "gmake && gmake install". Most of them are missing
Patch applied. Thanks.
The oid's you chose were fine. I updated the system catalog version
number, and added prototype for these functions.
---
Fabien COELHO wrote:
>
> Dear patchers,
>
> Please find a attached a small