On Sun, Jun 27, 2004 at 12:49:10AM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Alvaro Herrera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > I'll work on adding the Xid-cache to PGPROC and using that in
> > TransactionIdIsInProgress and the tqual routines. If you want to work
> > on that let me know and I'll handle things like the
On Sat, Jun 26, 2004 at 07:56:09PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> BTW, it would help to know what parts of the patch you intend to work on
> over the next couple of days. I'm reviewing and editorializing right
> now with intent to commit soon, so it would be good if we can avoid
> tromping on each othe
Alvaro Herrera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I'll work on adding the Xid-cache to PGPROC and using that in
> TransactionIdIsInProgress and the tqual routines. If you want to work
> on that let me know and I'll handle things like the password file, local
> bufmgr refcount, etc.
Either one is okay,
On Sat, Jun 26, 2004 at 07:56:09PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Do we really need SubtransCutoffXid? AFAICS the reason for having it is
> only this claim in RecordTransactionCommit:
>
> * We can't mark committed subtransactions as fully committed,
> * because concurrent transactions
Do we really need SubtransCutoffXid? AFAICS the reason for having it is
only this claim in RecordTransactionCommit:
* We can't mark committed subtransactions as fully committed,
* because concurrent transactions would see them as committed
* and not as in-progress. Lea
