Alvaro Herrera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hmm ... yes, this could be very ugly indeed, but I haven't even looked
> at the executor code so I can't comment. Are executor nodes copyable?
Nope, and even if we had support for that the executor tree per se
is just the tip of the iceberg. There's a
On Tue, 2004-06-29 at 20:59, Simon Riggs wrote:
> On Mon, 2004-06-28 at 21:58, Simon Riggs wrote:
> > PITR Archive Recovery, 28 June 2004
> >
> > What's in this patch?
This my LAST, PLANNED patch before Freeze. Any questions?
This is a patch-on-patch, rather than a full patch. To use this, apply
On Tue, Jun 29, 2004 at 06:59:20PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Alvaro Herrera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > As with the bufmgr.c original patch, I don't really know how to test
> > that this actually works. [...]
>
> I forgot to mention to you that that code didn't work at all, btw.
Bad news, I g
Alvaro Herrera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> As with the bufmgr.c original patch, I don't really know how to test
> that this actually works. I fooled around with printing what it was
> doing during a subtrans commit/abort, and it seems OK, but that's about
> it. In what situations can a transact
Andrew Dunstan said:
>
> There is a new known issue which will be addressed quickly:
> - empty string is interpreted as NULL - only undef should translate as
> NULL
>
I have fixes for this, which will appear soon. Details available at
http://lists.pgfoundry.org/pipermail/plperlng-devel/2004-June
On Sun, Jun 20, 2004 at 08:49:22PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> There's a good deal more than that missing :-(. Here are the modules or
> actions that are called in CommitTransaction and/or AbortTransaction
> that have not yet been touched by the patch:
>
> localbuf.c (refcounts need fixed same as b
Alvaro Herrera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> - GUC vars are rolled back on subxact abort
This did not work very well, but here is a revised GUC patch that I think
does work. It requires xact.c to export a function to report the
current nesting depth, and requires AtEOXact_GUC to be called in all
On Mon, 2004-06-28 at 21:58, Simon Riggs wrote:
> PITR Archive Recovery, 28 June 2004
>
> What's in this patch?
>
> - All of what was in previous PITR Archival patch, including reworking
> of all the archiver startup/shutdown code to match that of pgstat
> - New code to perform Archive Recovery m
On Tue, Jun 29, 2004 at 03:22:52PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Alvaro Herrera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > - GUC vars are rolled back on subxact abort
>
> This did not work very well, but here is a revised GUC patch that I think
> does work. It requires xact.c to export a function to report the
>
Andrew Dunstan wrote:
Quick head up - I have a fix for the count hash keys 'fix' I reverted
yesterday, and also a patch from Joe Coway to allow returning record
and setof record.
Revised patch will be forthcoming after some testing.
The attached patch (and 2 new files incorporating previous el
Quick head up - I have a fix for the count hash keys 'fix' I reverted
yesterday, and also a patch from Joe Coway to allow returning record and
setof record.
Revised patch will be forthcoming after some testing.
cheers
andrew
---(end of broadcast)--
11 matches
Mail list logo
