[PATCHES] [PATCH] Symbol restriction and versioning

2005-10-18 Thread Martijn van Oosterhout
[Please CC any replies, thanks] NOTE: I am not requesting that this patch is integrated, only that it exists in the archive in case future problems emerge requiring it. It's essentially something that only works for Linux and select other OSes and the bug it fixes is somewhat outside the scope of

[PATCHES] Small plperl documentation patch

2005-10-18 Thread Greg Sabino Mullane
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 NotDashEscaped: You need GnuPG to verify this message Using $a and $b for temporary vars are bad form for our example, as they have special meaning in Perl. Index: plperl.sgml === RCS

Re: [PATCHES] Small plperl documentation patch

2005-10-18 Thread Andrew Dunstan
Patch applied, thanks. I actually told somebody off roundly about this not long ago. cheers andrew Greg Sabino Mullane wrote: Using $a and $b for temporary vars are bad form for our example, as they have special meaning in Perl. [snip] ---(end of

Re: [PATCHES] Small plperl documentation patch

2005-10-18 Thread Tom Lane
Greg Sabino Mullane [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Using $a and $b for temporary vars are bad form for our example, as they have special meaning in Perl. Please, tell me that isn't so. $a is a reserved name now? What was Larry thinking? regards, tom lane

Re: [PATCHES] Small plperl documentation patch

2005-10-18 Thread Greg Sabino Mullane
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Tom Lane asked: Please, tell me that isn't so. $a is a reserved name now? What was Larry thinking? It's not that bad, really. $a and $b have special meaning inside of a sort subroutine as the two items being compared. Thus, you can write