>>> On 16.06.2006 at 23:21:21, in message
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Bruce Momjian
wrote:
> Yea. Where you using WAL archiving? We will have a fix in 8.1.5 to
> prevent multiple archivers from starting. Perhaps that was a cause.
>
Not at the time, no. The rename in question was just a regular WAL
s
Sven <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> If this approach is not satisfactionary and assertion predetection is
> still requested, only solution I see is to catch signal SIGABRT, set
> flag, longjmp back and report error.
> But I really don't like it.
No, ignoring SIGABRT is surely right out.
It suddenl
