Josh Berkus wrote:
> Zdenek, Bruce,
>
> Has anyone updated the Solaris portion of runtime.sgml yet?
No, I was unaware it needed updating.
--
Bruce Momjian [EMAIL PROTECTED]
EnterpriseDBhttp://www.enterprisedb.com
+ If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +
---
Zdenek, Bruce,
Has anyone updated the Solaris portion of runtime.sgml yet?
--
--Josh
Josh Berkus
PostgreSQL @ Sun
San Francisco
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 4: Have you searched our list archives?
http://archives.postgresql.org
Patch applied. Thanks.
---
Zdenek Kotala wrote:
> I updated FAQ_Solaris. I added new information related to Solaris 10,
> rewrote optimalization hints and add information about dtrace. I talked
> with Peter about "Curre
I updated FAQ_Solaris. I added new information related to Solaris 10,
rewrote optimalization hints and add information about dtrace. I talked
with Peter about "Current maintainer" role, and he said that this
information says anything and should be deleted.
Please, let me know your co
Tom Lane wrote:
Zdenek Kotala <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
There is new version of catalogs overview patch. This version add only
one column into overview table which contains Oid/Filename for each
catalog table. Oid information is important if someone need make
relation with filename on disk a
"Magnus Hagander" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> See attached patch.
Grumble. That's going to be a continuing maintenance pain, isn't it?
We need to find a way to extract the list from the src/port Makefile.
regards, tom lane
---(end of broadcast)-
Zdenek Kotala <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> There is new version of catalogs overview patch. This version add only
> one column into overview table which contains Oid/Filename for each
> catalog table. Oid information is important if someone need make
> relation with filename on disk and related
See attached patch.
//Magnus
msvc_qsort.diff
Description: msvc_qsort.diff
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 4: Have you searched our list archives?
http://archives.postgresql.org
Zdenek Kotala wrote:
Alvaro Herrera wrote:
What's "global"? A maybe-useful flag would be telling that a table is
shared. Is that it? Mind you, it's not useful to me because I know
which tables are shared, but I guess for someone not so familiar with
the catalogs it could have some use.
Gl
Magnus Hagander wrote:
> > >>> Attached patch adds a version check for bison when running the
> > vc++
> > >>> build.
> > >>
> > >> Shouldn't it be looking for 2.1 as well?
> >
> > > 2.1 is the broken one.
> >
> > Exactly. So we should reject it.
>
> We do. The code as-is *only* accepts 1.875.
> >>> Attached patch adds a version check for bison when running the
> vc++
> >>> build.
> >>
> >> Shouldn't it be looking for 2.1 as well?
>
> > 2.1 is the broken one.
>
> Exactly. So we should reject it.
We do. The code as-is *only* accepts 1.875. Thus it rejects 2.1.
//Magnus
-
11 matches
Mail list logo