Greg Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Right now when you run pgbench, the results vary considerably from run to
run even if you completely rebuild the database every time. I've found
that a lot of that variation comes from two things:
This is a real issue, but I think your proposed patch
On Mon, 12 Feb 2007, Tom Lane wrote:
This is a real issue, but I think your proposed patch does not fix it.
I certainly wouldn't claim that my patch _fixes_ the problem in the
general case; it provides one way to measure it. Currently it's not
obvious to new pgbench users that the problem
Tom Lane wrote:
Bruce Momjian [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Ultimately, the result was that glibc was wrong in its locale settings,
and there was a suggestion to use defaults only when using the C locale.
However, I am worried there are too many locales in the field that only
define some of
Hi,
Right now when you run pgbench, the results vary considerably from run to
run even if you completely rebuild the database every time. I've found
that a lot of that variation comes from two things:
The main purpose of pgbench runs is an apples to apples comparison of 2
source bases. One
NikhilS [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
As long as we use the same postgresql.conf, same hardware environment and
exactly same parameter pgbench runs, the difference in the TPS values
observed between the 2 sources should be a good enough indicator as to the
viability of the new code, dont you
