Alvaro Herrera wrote:
I'm wondering if there has been any effort to make this work in
conjunction with ITAGAKI Takahiro's patch to correct the dead tuple
count estimate.
I just looked at that patch. If we applied both patches, the dead_tuples
estimate would be off by the number of dead tuples
I have applied a modified version of your patch. I moved the prompt
'text' field as optional before name, and removed the default prompt
string, which seemed un-Unix-like.
I also simplified when stdin/stdout is used. If stdin is the terminal,
it seems it makes no difference if we use the
There is Solaris FAQ update. Please, look on it and let me know any
comments.
Thanks Zdenek
Rich Teer wrote:
The following bug has been logged online:
Bug reference: 2969
Logged by: Rich Teer
Email address: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PostgreSQL version: 8.2.2
Operating
Patch applied. Thanks.
---
Zdenek Kotala wrote:
There is Solaris FAQ update. Please, look on it and let me know any
comments.
Thanks Zdenek
Rich Teer wrote:
The following bug has been logged online:
Zdenek Kotala wrote:
There is Solaris FAQ update. Please, look on it and let me know any
comments.
The actual answer to the question Can I compile PostgreSQL with
Kerberos v5 support? is Yes, why not?. I don't think Can I use
this weird internal private library that seems to provide a
Peter Eisentraut wrote:
Bruce Momjian wrote:
I have implemented your ideas for checking BLCKSZ = 1024,
I think the check should be were the issue arises, not in some distant
file without explanation.
OK, moved to guc.c.
--
Bruce Momjian [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://momjian.us
