2008/6/25 Tom Lane [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Pavel Stehule [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Tom Lane wrote:
Your point about the syntax is good though. It would be better if
the syntax were like
create function foo (a text, variadic b int[])
or maybe even better
create function foo (a text, variadic b
Bruce Momjian wrote:
Tom Lane wrote:
Bruce Momjian [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
However, as of 2004-10-15, this has not worked. :-( The attached patch
is the one that caused the bug --- on non-Unix systems, SYSTEMQUOTE is
, meaning zero-length string. I should have seen the bug when I
Alvaro Herrera wrote:
Bruce Momjian wrote:
Tom Lane wrote:
Bruce Momjian [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
However, as of 2004-10-15, this has not worked. :-( The attached patch
is the one that caused the bug --- on non-Unix systems, SYSTEMQUOTE is
, meaning zero-length string. I
Bruce Momjian wrote:
, meaning zero-length string. I should have seen the bug when I
applied the contributed patch in 2004.
So, shouldn't this fix be back-patched?
Well, no one has actually complained about the breakage, and it has been
a few years. Also there is
Bruce Momjian wrote:
I am attaching a minimal patch that will fix the bug in back branches.
Keep in mind that a patched pg_ctl will not be able to restart a backend
that was not patched.
I think this patch will work for unpatched backends as well. I am still
uncertain if it should be
Bruce Momjian wrote:
Alvaro Herrera wrote:
Why do we need someone to complain? We know the bug is there. Has the
code changed a lot in that area?
Do we have the policy of backpatching every fix? I thought it was only
the major bugs we fixed in back branches. If someone wants to
Alvaro Herrera wrote:
Bruce Momjian wrote:
Alvaro Herrera wrote:
Why do we need someone to complain? We know the bug is there. Has the
code changed a lot in that area?
Do we have the policy of backpatching every fix? I thought it was only
the major bugs we fixed in back
Added to July patch queue. Thanks.
---
Simon Riggs wrote:
Re-sending post as discussed with Bruce...
On Sun, 2008-03-23 at 12:45 -0300, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
Bruce Momjian wrote:
Added to TODO:
We have come to agreement that there is no longer a need for a separate
'patches' email list --- the size of patches isn't a significant issue
anymore, and tracking threads between the patches and hackers lists is
confusing.
I propose we close the patches list and tell everyone to start using
Tom Lane wrote:
Bruce Momjian [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Alvaro Herrera wrote:
I've always assumed that I'm supposed to backpatch the bugs I fix in
HEAD, however far is reasonable.
I thought we only backatched major bugs to prevent possible instability
when fixing minor bugs.
10 matches
Mail list logo
