Re: [PATCHES] [HACKERS] Infrastructure changes for recovery

2008-09-17 Thread Simon Riggs
On Tue, 2008-09-16 at 15:45 -0400, Tom Lane wrote: Simon Riggs [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Testing takes a while on this, I probably won't complete it until Friday. So enclosed patch is for eyeballs only at this stage. What's the status on that patch? Checking EXEC_BACKEND case and that

Re: [PATCHES] still alive?

2008-09-17 Thread Bernd Helmle
--On Donnerstag, September 11, 2008 15:39:01 +0300 Peter Eisentraut [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hmm, let's try this: Anyone who thinks the patches list should remain as separate from hackers, shout now (with rationale)! Seems i've missed something, what's then supposed to hold patches now?

Re: [PATCHES] still alive?

2008-09-17 Thread Alvaro Herrera
Bernd Helmle wrote: --On Donnerstag, September 11, 2008 15:39:01 +0300 Peter Eisentraut [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hmm, let's try this: Anyone who thinks the patches list should remain as separate from hackers, shout now (with rationale)! Seems i've missed something, what's then supposed

Re: [PATCHES] still alive?

2008-09-17 Thread Heikki Linnakangas
Bernd Helmle wrote: --On Donnerstag, September 11, 2008 15:39:01 +0300 Peter Eisentraut [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Anyone who thinks the patches list should remain as separate from hackers, shout now (with rationale)! Seems i've missed something, what's then supposed to hold patches now? Just

Re: [PATCHES] still alive?

2008-09-17 Thread Bernd Helmle
--On Mittwoch, September 17, 2008 22:37:29 +0300 Heikki Linnakangas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Just send them to pgsql-hackers. Oh, that's fine, since discussions are already moved from -patches and are continued there. The only disadvantage i see is that -hackers is a little more frequented