On Tue, 2008-09-16 at 15:45 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
Simon Riggs [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Testing takes a while on this, I probably won't complete it until
Friday. So enclosed patch is for eyeballs only at this stage.
What's the status on that patch?
Checking EXEC_BACKEND case and that
--On Donnerstag, September 11, 2008 15:39:01 +0300 Peter Eisentraut
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hmm, let's try this:
Anyone who thinks the patches list should remain as separate from
hackers, shout now (with rationale)!
Seems i've missed something, what's then supposed to hold patches now?
Bernd Helmle wrote:
--On Donnerstag, September 11, 2008 15:39:01 +0300 Peter Eisentraut
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hmm, let's try this:
Anyone who thinks the patches list should remain as separate from
hackers, shout now (with rationale)!
Seems i've missed something, what's then supposed
Bernd Helmle wrote:
--On Donnerstag, September 11, 2008 15:39:01 +0300 Peter Eisentraut
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Anyone who thinks the patches list should remain as separate from
hackers, shout now (with rationale)!
Seems i've missed something, what's then supposed to hold patches now?
Just
--On Mittwoch, September 17, 2008 22:37:29 +0300 Heikki Linnakangas
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Just send them to pgsql-hackers.
Oh, that's fine, since discussions are already moved from -patches and are
continued there. The only disadvantage i see is that -hackers is a little
more frequented