Re: [PATCHES] bgwriter stats

On Monday 19 March 2007 15:32, Tom Lane wrote: Magnus Hagander [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: I want to be able to pull some stats out of the bgwriter to be able to track things. One thing is the total number of buffers written out. Other things are the number of checkpoints and such.

Re: [PATCHES] log_autovacuum

not useful for machine parsing anyway. This goes back to the request for vacuum loging to a table.. -- Darcy Buskermolen Command Prompt, Inc. Sales/Support: +1.503.667.4564 || 24x7/Emergency: +1.800.492.2240 PostgreSQL solutions since 1997 http://www.commandprompt.com

[PATCHES] pg_standby Error cleanup

Please find attached a patch which provides for logging in the event that -k is unable to clean up an old WAL file. Also make the failed to remove file error message consistant for the trigger file. -- Darcy Buskermolen Command Prompt, Inc. Sales/Support: +1.503.667.4564 || 24x7/Emergency

Re: [HACKERS] [PATCHES] [PATCH] Provide 8-byte transaction IDs to user level

On Wednesday 26 July 2006 14:27, Darcy Buskermolen wrote: On Wednesday 26 July 2006 14:03, Tom Lane wrote: Darcy Buskermolen [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: The question though is if we did that, would Slony actually use it? If it made sence to do it, then yes we would do it. The problem

Re: [HACKERS] [PATCHES] [PATCH] Provide 8-byte transaction IDs to user level

, tom lane ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 2: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster -- Darcy Buskermolen CommandPrompt, Inc. Sales/Support: +1.503.667.4564 || 24x7/Emergency: +1.800.492.2240 http://www.commandprompt.com

Re: [HACKERS] [PATCHES] [PATCH] Provide 8-byte transaction IDs to user level

On Wednesday 26 July 2006 14:03, Tom Lane wrote: Darcy Buskermolen [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: The question though is if we did that, would Slony actually use it? If it made sence to do it, then yes we would do it. The problem ends up being Slony is designed to work across a multitude

[PATCHES] postgresql.conf listen_address comment clarification

The term interfaces is a bit ambiguous and unclear that hostname/ipaddresses are expected and not a physical name (eth0, lo0, fxp0, .) I hope this patch clears that up a bit to bring it more in line with the official documentation. -- Darcy Buskermolen Wavefire Technologies Corp. http

Re: [PATCHES] [HACKERS] Proof-of-concept for initdb-time shared_buffers selection

Michael/Tom on this one as well, Lets at least get this framework inplace, we can always experment with what values we settle on. -- Darcy Buskermolen Wavefire Technologies Corp. ph: 250.717.0200 fx: 250.763.1759 http://www.wavefire.com ---(end of broadcast