Added to TODO:
* Add GUC variable to allow output of interval values in ISO8601 format
---
Tom Lane wrote:
> Ron Mayer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Would formatting functions for intervals such as...
> >to_iso8
Ron Mayer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Would formatting functions for intervals such as...
>to_iso8601basic_char(interval) -- return ISO-8601 basic fmt interval
>to_iso8601basic_char(timestamp) -- return ISO-8601 basic fmt date/time
> would be better than a new GUC variable?
I could
On Sat, 20 Dec 2003, Bruce Momjian wrote:
>Tom Lane wrote:
>>This is a horrid, horrid idea. Datestyle is already a complete mess
>> ...
>>Please revert that part of the patch and instead invent a new GUC
>>variable that's specifically for interval formatting.
>
> OK, I have backed out the patch.
Tom Lane wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Bruce Momjian) writes:
> > Attached is a patch that addressed all the discussed issues that
> > did not break backward compatability,
>
> Was this patch actually agreed to? I hadn't gotten around to looking
> at it because I thought Peter was still obj
