Re: [PATCHES] [HACKERS] New array functions

2003-09-14 Thread Tom Lane
Greg Stark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Joe Conway wrote: >> I'll try to take a look at contrib/intarray and contrib/intagg before >> the weekend is through, and at least post a recommendation. > Can I pipe up in int_aggregate.c's defense ? I don't think we're removing it just yet. The contrib

Re: [PATCHES] [HACKERS] New array functions

2003-09-11 Thread Bruce Momjian
Patch applied. Thanks. --- Joe Conway wrote: > Joe Conway wrote: > > Tom Lane wrote: > >> Did we discuss this already? I'd forgotten. > >> > > I can't find it in the archives for some reason, but here was the exchange: >

Re: [PATCHES] [HACKERS] New array functions

2003-09-09 Thread Bruce Momjian
Your patch has been added to the PostgreSQL unapplied patches list at: http://momjian.postgresql.org/cgi-bin/pgpatches I will try to apply it within the next 48 hours. --- Joe Conway wrote: > Joe Conway wrote: > >

Re: [PATCHES] [HACKERS] New array functions

2003-08-31 Thread Joe Conway
Joe Conway wrote: Tom Lane wrote: Did we discuss this already? I'd forgotten. I can't find it in the archives for some reason, but here was the exchange: Tom Lane wrote: > Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >>Joe Conway wrote: >> >>>I do agree that it makes contrib/array unnecessar