Mary Edie Meredith wrote:
> On Fri, 2005-08-12 at 14:53 -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > Mary Edie Meredith wrote:
> > > Just to be certain I know what I have and how to use it,
> > > please confirm the following is correct.
> > >
> > > According to Markw, the tarball we have at OSDL that is
> > >
On Fri, 2005-08-12 at 14:53 -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Mary Edie Meredith wrote:
> > Just to be certain I know what I have and how to use it,
> > please confirm the following is correct.
> >
> > According to Markw, the tarball we have at OSDL that is
> > dated 7/29 already has the O_DIRECT pat
Mary Edie Meredith wrote:
> Just to be certain I know what I have and how to use it,
> please confirm the following is correct.
>
> According to Markw, the tarball we have at OSDL that is
> dated 7/29 already has the O_DIRECT patch + wal grouping
> applied. Hence, I will use the one from the day
Just to be certain I know what I have and how to use it,
please confirm the following is correct.
According to Markw, the tarball we have at OSDL that is
dated 7/29 already has the O_DIRECT patch + wal grouping
applied. Hence, I will use the one from the day before:
postgresql-20050728.tar.bz2 a
Mark Wong wrote:
> On Thu, 11 Aug 2005 22:11:42 -0400 (EDT)
> Bruce Momjian wrote:
>
> > Tom Lane wrote:
> > > Bruce Momjian writes:
> > > >> O_DIRECT is only being used for WAL page writes (or I sure hope so
> > > >> anyway), so shared_buffers should be irrelevant.
> > >
> > > > Uh, O_DIRECT r
