Re: [PATCHES] [HACKERS] message for constraint

2006-01-16 Thread Bruce Momjian
I have added the following documentation addition to suggest this usage for constraint names. --- Jaime Casanova wrote: On 1/14/06, Peter Eisentraut [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Jaime Casanova wrote: From time to time

Re: [PATCHES] [HACKERS] message for constraint

2006-01-16 Thread Jaime Casanova
On 1/16/06, Bruce Momjian pgman@candle.pha.pa.us wrote: I have added the following documentation addition to suggest this usage for constraint names. --- --- 293,304 termliteralCONSTRAINT replaceable

Re: [PATCHES] [HACKERS] message for constraint

2006-01-16 Thread Jaime Casanova
On 1/16/06, Alvaro Herrera [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Jaime Casanova wrote: On 1/16/06, Bruce Momjian pgman@candle.pha.pa.us wrote: what about lower the context part of the messages for plpgsql functions? that seems debug info for me... just an idea ;) pruebas=# select prueba(); ERROR:

Re: [PATCHES] [HACKERS] message for constraint

2006-01-16 Thread Alvaro Herrera
Jaime Casanova wrote: On 1/16/06, Bruce Momjian pgman@candle.pha.pa.us wrote: what about lower the context part of the messages for plpgsql functions? that seems debug info for me... just an idea ;) pruebas=# select prueba(); ERROR: new row for relation foo violates check constraint