This patch is no longer needed. We can revisit this during 8.4 to see
if it is still needed now that we have HOT.
---
ITAGAKI Takahiro wrote:
Here is a patch discussed in
Your patch has been added to the PostgreSQL unapplied patches list at:
http://momjian.postgresql.org/cgi-bin/pgpatches
It will be applied as soon as one of the PostgreSQL committers reviews
and approves it.
---
Bruce Momjian wrote:
Your patch has been added to the PostgreSQL unapplied patches list at:
http://momjian.postgresql.org/cgi-bin/pgpatches
It will be applied as soon as one of the PostgreSQL committers reviews
and approves it.
Please put this on hold until we decide what to do
Alvaro Herrera wrote:
Bruce Momjian wrote:
Your patch has been added to the PostgreSQL unapplied patches list at:
http://momjian.postgresql.org/cgi-bin/pgpatches
It will be applied as soon as one of the PostgreSQL committers reviews
and approves it.
Please put this on hold
Alvaro Herrera [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Please put this on hold until we decide what to do with Heikki's patch
to update OldestXmin during vacuum.
Yes, I think his patch is very useful, but it has a little conflict
with my patch.
One idea is to count the tuples actually cleared during
Here is a patch discussed in
http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2007-02/msg00010.php
Concurrent vacuum will save n_dead_tuples value at the beginning.
Stats collector will be subtract the value from n_dead_tuples
instead of setting it to zero. The statistics accuracy of n_dead_tuples