Re: [PATCHES] Fix PGPORT reassignment in ecpg regression tests

2006-09-05 Thread Michael Glaesemann
On Sep 5, 2006, at 19:16 , Michael Meskes wrote: On Mon, Sep 04, 2006 at 11:54:42PM +0900, Michael Glaesemann wrote: The pg_regress.sh script for ecpg regression tests checks to make sure the port number is between 1024 and 65535. If it isn't, it uses 65432. (c310-315. This is the same behavio

Re: [PATCHES] Fix PGPORT reassignment in ecpg regression tests

2006-09-05 Thread Michael Meskes
On Mon, Sep 04, 2006 at 11:54:42PM +0900, Michael Glaesemann wrote: > The pg_regress.sh script for ecpg regression tests checks to make > sure the port number is between 1024 and 65535. If it isn't, it uses > 65432. (c310-315. This is the same behavior as the standard > ... Applied. Michael

[PATCHES] Fix PGPORT reassignment in ecpg regression tests

2006-09-04 Thread Michael Glaesemann
The pg_regress.sh script for ecpg regression tests checks to make sure the port number is between 1024 and 65535. If it isn't, it uses 65432. (c310-315. This is the same behavior as the standard regression tests, I believe.) However, it if does reassign the port number, it was changing it b