Bruce Momjian napsal(a):
Zdenek Kotala wrote:
Tom Lane napsal(a):
Zdenek Kotala [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
During my work I found some header files, which include useless headers
and on other way there are some headers which silently assume that
requested header will be included by some
Bruce Momjian napsal(a):
Zdenek Kotala wrote:
Tom Lane napsal(a):
Zdenek Kotala [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
During my work I found some header files, which include useless headers
and on other way there are some headers which silently assume that
requested header will be included by some
Tom Lane napsal(a):
Bruce Momjian [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Zdenek Kotala wrote:
bufpage.h includes bufmgr.h, but bufpage.h does not require any definition from
bufmgr.h. I think this dependency is there for long time.
My scripts should have found this issue, see
Zdenek Kotala wrote:
PS: Is there any reason to do not start to use inline functions instead
of macros in some cases?
Not all compilers like (== support) inline macros apparently.
--
Alvaro Herrerahttp://www.CommandPrompt.com/
The PostgreSQL Company - Command
Zdenek Kotala wrote:
Alvaro Herrera napsal(a):
Zdenek Kotala wrote:
PS: Is there any reason to do not start to use inline functions
instead of macros in some cases?
Not all compilers like (== support) inline macros apparently.
Is it your assumption or do you mean some specific compiler?
Zdenek Kotala wrote:
Is it your assumption or do you mean some specific compiler? IIRC,
inline is defined in C99 and my assumption :-) is that it should be
supported by all compilers today. I try to look on buildmachine, There
should be some useful configure output.
My recollection is
Alvaro Herrera napsal(a):
Zdenek Kotala wrote:
PS: Is there any reason to do not start to use inline functions instead
of macros in some cases?
Not all compilers like (== support) inline macros apparently.
Is it your assumption or do you mean some specific compiler? IIRC, inline is
Zdenek Kotala [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Alvaro Herrera napsal(a):
Not all compilers like (== support) inline macros apparently.
Is it your assumption or do you mean some specific compiler? IIRC, inline is
defined in C99 and my assumption :-) is that it should be supported by all
compilers
Tom Lane wrote:
Alvaro Herrera [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Zdenek Kotala wrote:
During my work I found some header files, which include useless headers
and on other way there are some headers which silently assume that
requested header will be included by some other headers file.
Zdenek Kotala wrote:
Tom Lane napsal(a):
Zdenek Kotala [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
During my work I found some header files, which include useless headers
and on other way there are some headers which silently assume that
requested header will be included by some other headers file.
Bruce Momjian [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Zdenek Kotala wrote:
bufpage.h includes bufmgr.h, but bufpage.h does not require any definition
from
bufmgr.h. I think this dependency is there for long time.
My scripts should have found this issue, see
src/tools/pginclude/pgrminclude.
Looking
Bruce Momjian [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I run it every few years rather than every year because it can break
stuff that we have to manually fix by adding includes.
If you want it run now or every year, let me know.
I'm not in a hurry --- as we found out last time, that script isn't
really
Tom Lane wrote:
Bruce Momjian [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I run it every few years rather than every year because it can break
stuff that we have to manually fix by adding includes.
If you want it run now or every year, let me know.
I'm not in a hurry --- as we found out last time, that
Zdenek Kotala wrote:
During my work I found some header files, which include useless headers
and on other way there are some headers which silently assume that
requested header will be included by some other headers file.
This patch fixes these dependencies around bufpage.h, bufmgr.h
Alvaro Herrera [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Zdenek Kotala wrote:
During my work I found some header files, which include useless headers
and on other way there are some headers which silently assume that
requested header will be included by some other headers file.
This patch fixes these
Alvaro Herrera napsal(a):
Zdenek Kotala wrote:
During my work I found some header files, which include useless headers
and on other way there are some headers which silently assume that
requested header will be included by some other headers file.
This patch fixes these dependencies around
Tom Lane napsal(a):
Alvaro Herrera [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Zdenek Kotala wrote:
During my work I found some header files, which include useless headers
and on other way there are some headers which silently assume that
requested header will be included by some other headers file.
This
Zdenek Kotala [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
During my work I found some header files, which include useless headers
and on other way there are some headers which silently assume that
requested header will be included by some other headers file.
Bruce periodically runs a script that's
Tom Lane napsal(a):
Zdenek Kotala [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
During my work I found some header files, which include useless headers
and on other way there are some headers which silently assume that
requested header will be included by some other headers file.
Bruce periodically runs a
During my work I found some header files, which include useless headers
and on other way there are some headers which silently assume that
requested header will be included by some other headers file.
This patch fixes these dependencies around bufpage.h, bufmgr.h
20 matches
Mail list logo
