Tom Lane wrote:
One thing I did *not* like was changing the FSM API to refer to Relation
rather than RelFileNode --- I don't believe that's a good idea at all.
In particular, consider what happens during TRUNCATE or CLUSTER: it's
not very clear how you'll tell the versions of the relation apart.
Heikki Linnakangas [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Tom Lane wrote:
One thing I did *not* like was changing the FSM API to refer to Relation
rather than RelFileNode --- I don't believe that's a good idea at all.
Oh really? I'm quite fond of the new API. From a philosophical point of
view, in the
Heikki Linnakangas [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
I'm not completely satisfied with the way this looks, so I'll try a
slightly different approach next: Instead of having one SMgrRelation per
fork, add an extra ForkNumber argument to all the smgr functions.
Here's an
