Re: [PATCHES] Scanning for insert

2006-03-02 Thread Tom Lane
James William Pye <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > The problem with the AM no longer having the ability to make guarantees about > lock/state duration seems more or less unavoidable with this two-step process. So in other words, a two-step process is wrong. > Besides that I think it's ready for revi

[PATCHES] Scanning for insert

2006-03-02 Thread James William Pye
Ok. Here's a `gmake check` passing version that actually makes use of the new AM entries in ExecInsert. Currently, AFAICS, this *only* provides an improvement for systems that frequently insert duplicate rows. Perhaps not a common case, but an improvement nonetheless, IMO. I leaned in this directi