Alexey Klyukin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Gregory Stark wrote:
>> pgbench's random number generator was only generating the first and last
>> value
>> in the specified range half as often as other values in the range.
> I think this line should be altered this way:
> return min + (int) (((max
Uhm, this is a one-line *bug fix*.
"Bruce Momjian" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> This has been saved for the 8.4 release:
>
> http://momjian.postgresql.org/cgi-bin/pgpatches_hold
>
> ---
>
> Gregory Stark wrote:
>>
>
Gregory Stark wrote:
>
> Uhm, this is a one-line *bug fix*.
There wasn't agreement on how it should be fixed, it is a minor bug, and
as you said, we should be focusing on the significant outstanding
patches submitted before feature freeze.
This has been saved for the 8.4 release:
http://momjian.postgresql.org/cgi-bin/pgpatches_hold
---
Gregory Stark wrote:
>
> pgbench's random number generator was only generating the first and last value
> in the spe
Gregory Stark wrote:
>
> pgbench's random number generator was only generating the first and last value
> in the specified range half as often as other values in the range. Not that it
> actually matters but it may as well do what it claims. This line has a pretty
> long and sordid history with va
pgbench's random number generator was only generating the first and last value
in the specified range half as often as other values in the range. Not that it
actually matters but it may as well do what it claims. This line has a pretty
long and sordid history with various people tweaking it one wa
