ITAGAKI Takahiro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I resend the patch with diff -c.
What does XLOG_EXTRA_BUFFERS accomplish?
Also, I'm worried that you broke something by not updating
Write->curridx immediately in XLogWrite. There certainly isn't going
to be any measurable performance boost from kee
Excuse me.
I resend the patch with diff -c.
On Tue, 25 Jan 2005 10:30:01 +0100
"Michael Paesold" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> ITAGAKI Takahiro wrote:
>
> > I think that there is room for improvement in WAL.
> > Here is a patch for it.
>
> I think you should resend your patch as a context diff
ITAGAKI Takahiro wrote:
I think that there is room for improvement in WAL.
Here is a patch for it.
I think you should resend your patch as a context diff (diff -c). Otherwise
it's hard to see what your patch does.
Best Regards,
Michael Paesold
---(end of broadcast)--
Hello, all.
I think that there is room for improvement in WAL.
Here is a patch for it.
- Multiple pages are written in one write() if it is contiguous.
- Add 'open_direct' to wal_sync_method.
WAL writer writes one page in one write(). This is not efficient
when wal_sync_method is 'open_sync'
