Simon Riggs wrote:
On Tue, 2007-03-27 at 17:41 -0400, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
The main change is to have an array of Worker structs in shared memory;
each worker checks the current table of all other Workers, and skips a
table that's being vacuumed by any of them. It also rechecks the
On Wed, 2007-03-28 at 09:39 -0400, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
What other auxiliary processes are you envisioning, anyway?
WAL Writer, multiple bgwriters, checkpoint process, parallel query and
sort slavesplus all the ones I haven't dreamed of yet.
No need to agree with my short list, but we do
Hi,
This is the patch to put multiple workers into autovacuum. This patch
applies after the recheck patch I just posted.
The main change is to have an array of Worker structs in shared memory;
each worker checks the current table of all other Workers, and skips a
table that's being vacuumed by
On Tue, 2007-03-27 at 17:41 -0400, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
The main change is to have an array of Worker structs in shared memory;
each worker checks the current table of all other Workers, and skips a
table that's being vacuumed by any of them. It also rechecks the table
before vacuuming,
