On Mon, 2003-11-03 at 10:00, Tom Lane wrote:
I do not actually agree with the UnlockAndReleaseBuffer changes
anyway. I think this obscures the code by making resource grabbing
and resource releasing code unsymmetrical
Hmm... fair enough, I see your point. In that case, should I remove the
This patch cleans up some of the bufmgr code:
- replace uses of
LockBuffer(buf, BUFFER_LOCK_UNLOCK);
ReleaseBuffer(buf);
with the equivalent, but more concise:
UnlockAndReleaseBuffer(buf);
- analogous changes were made by replacing LockBuffer() +
