Re: [PATCHES] cosmetic patch to large object regression test

2007-03-03 Thread Neil Conway
On Sat, 2007-03-03 at 14:48 -0800, Jeremy Drake wrote: > Another usage of the old workaround for the flags was added with the > application of the lo_truncate patch. This patch changes that one to be > consistent with the others. Applied, thanks. -Neil ---(end of broad

Re: [PATCHES] cosmetic patch to large object regression test

2007-03-03 Thread Jeremy Drake
On Sat, 3 Mar 2007, Bruce Momjian wrote: > > Patch applied. Thanks. Another usage of the old workaround for the flags was added with the application of the lo_truncate patch. This patch changes that one to be consistent with the others. > ---

Re: [PATCHES] cosmetic patch to large object regression test

2007-03-03 Thread Bruce Momjian
Patch applied. Thanks. --- Jeremy Drake wrote: > Since I have now learned that it is possible to input values in hex in > postgres, I submit this patch to clean up the ugly workaround I did in the > largeobject regression

Re: [PATCHES] cosmetic patch to large object regression test

2007-03-02 Thread Bruce Momjian
Your patch has been added to the PostgreSQL unapplied patches list at: http://momjian.postgresql.org/cgi-bin/pgpatches It will be applied as soon as one of the PostgreSQL committers reviews and approves it. --- Je

[PATCHES] cosmetic patch to large object regression test

2007-03-02 Thread Jeremy Drake
Since I have now learned that it is possible to input values in hex in postgres, I submit this patch to clean up the ugly workaround I did in the largeobject regression test to try to input hex values. It does not change the functionality of the test at all, it just makes it more readable. In det