Neil Conway wrote:
I'll apply this patch to HEAD later today, barring any objections.
Applied.
-Neil
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 1: subscribe and unsubscribe commands go to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Tom Lane wrote:
I'm worried about whether this doesn't break the EXEC_BACKEND case.
Most of the code you've moved out isn't applicable to Windows, but
the fflushes probably are
Right, which is why the patch adds fflushes to the Unix implementation
of internal_forkexec(). On reflection, it is
This patch moves all the common code that is usually invoked before
doing a fork() into a single function, fork_process(). It is not aware
of the EXEC_BACKEND machinery, so it should be used as fork() currently
is -- inside an #ifndef EXEC_BACKEND block, if appropriate.
I wasn't sure whether
Neil Conway [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
This patch moves all the common code that is usually invoked before
doing a fork() into a single function, fork_process(). It is not aware
of the EXEC_BACKEND machinery, so it should be used as fork() currently
is -- inside an #ifndef EXEC_BACKEND
