Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Patch applied. Thanks.
>
> I suspect the point was that limits.h is needed *instead of* math.h,
> not *in addition to*. How many of those headers had math.h before?
The issue was that an include file included another include file t
Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Patch applied. Thanks.
I suspect the point was that limits.h is needed *instead of* math.h,
not *in addition to*. How many of those headers had math.h before?
regards, tom lane
---(end of broadcast)
On Fri, 14 Jul 2006, Tom Lane wrote:
I think that Bruce thought that defines INT_MAX and related
symbols, whereas the spec is perfectly clear that they're in
. However, that's where they are on my machines, and yet CVS
tip is not failing for me. I'm not clear why not... What platform
are y
Tom Lane wrote:
> Kris Jurka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > The attached patch makes the tree build for me again after the recent
> > include changes. This patch still violates the postgres.h before all
> > system headers rule and I'm still not sure what changed that broke
> > everything, but
Kris Jurka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> The attached patch makes the tree build for me again after the recent
> include changes. This patch still violates the postgres.h before all
> system headers rule and I'm still not sure what changed that broke
> everything, but if people need to get work
Patch applied. Thanks.
---
Kris Jurka wrote:
>
> The attached patch makes the tree build for me again after the recent
> include changes. This patch still violates the postgres.h before all
> system headers rule and I'
The attached patch makes the tree build for me again after the recent
include changes. This patch still violates the postgres.h before all
system headers rule and I'm still not sure what changed that broke
everything, but if people need to get work done this may help.
Kris JurkaIndex: contr
