This has been saved for the 8.4 release:
http://momjian.postgresql.org/cgi-bin/pgpatches_hold
---
Gregory Stark wrote:
Here's an updated patch that fixes the bug I had. This is now functional basic
This has been saved for the 8.4 release:
http://momjian.postgresql.org/cgi-bin/pgpatches_hold
---
Gregory Stark wrote:
David Fetter [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Mon, Apr 09, 2007 at 06:43:08PM -0400, Tom Lane
David Fetter [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Mon, Apr 09, 2007 at 06:43:08PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
So this does not really add any new functionality, it's just variant
syntax for something you can do about as easily without it, right?
Not totally as easily. For example, you can do some kinds
Gregory Stark [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Here's an updated patch that fixes the bug I had. This is now functional basic
non-recursive WITH clause support.
http://community.enterprisedb.com/recursive/with-pg82stable-v2.patch.gz
It's a pretty short simple patch as is; it just directly inlines
On Mon, Apr 09, 2007 at 06:43:08PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
Gregory Stark [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Here's an updated patch that fixes the bug I had. This is now functional
basic
non-recursive WITH clause support.
http://community.enterprisedb.com/recursive/with-pg82stable-v2.patch.gz
David Fetter [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Mon, Apr 09, 2007 at 06:43:08PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
So this does not really add any new functionality, it's just variant
syntax for something you can do about as easily without it, right?
Not totally as easily. For example, you can do some kinds
On Mon, Apr 09, 2007 at 09:08:31PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
David Fetter [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Mon, Apr 09, 2007 at 06:43:08PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
So this does not really add any new functionality, it's just variant
syntax for something you can do about as easily without it, right?
Your patch has been added to the PostgreSQL unapplied patches list at:
http://momjian.postgresql.org/cgi-bin/pgpatches
It will be applied as soon as one of the PostgreSQL committers reviews
and approves it.
---
Here's an updated patch that fixes the bug I had. This is now functional basic
non-recursive WITH clause support.
http://community.enterprisedb.com/recursive/with-pg82stable-v2.patch.gz
It's a pretty short simple patch as is; it just directly inlines any WITH
clauses as if they had been
