On Tue, 2005-01-18 at 16:43 +1100, Neil Conway wrote:
> Barring any objections, I intend to apply this patch tomorrow.
Applied.
-Neil
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
subscribe-no
Barring any objections, I intend to apply this patch tomorrow. The
patch, as well as the original -patches email, are included below.
-Neil
On Wed, 2004-11-24 at 11:15 +1100, Neil Conway wrote:
> This patch makes some improvements to the rtree index implementation:
>
> (1) Keep a pin on the scan
On Tue, 2004-11-23 at 23:40 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> Please hold this for the 8.1 cycle. I think we are past the time for
> non-bug-fix changes in the 8.0 release.
Sorry, I should have mentioned that explicitly: I have (and had) no
intention of applying this for 8.0.
-Neil
---
Neil Conway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> This patch makes some improvements to the rtree index implementation:
Please hold this for the 8.1 cycle. I think we are past the time for
non-bug-fix changes in the 8.0 release.
regards, tom lane
---(end
This patch makes some improvements to the rtree index implementation:
(1) Keep a pin on the scan's current buffer and mark buffer. This avoids
the need to do a ReadBuffer() for each tuple produced by the scan.
(2) Convert a ReleaseBuffer() ; ReadBuffer() pair into
ReleaseAndReadBuffer(). Surely n
