Re: [PATCHES] still alive?

Simon Riggs wrote: On Thu, 2008-09-11 at 15:39 +0300, Peter Eisentraut wrote: Bruce Momjian wrote: Abhijit Menon-Sen wrote: I thought -patches was supposed to die. What happened? I was wondering the same thing. Peter? Hmm, let's try this: Anyone who thinks the patches list should remain

Re: [PATCHES] still alive?

Peter Eisentraut wrote: Simon Riggs wrote: On Thu, 2008-09-11 at 15:39 +0300, Peter Eisentraut wrote: Bruce Momjian wrote: Abhijit Menon-Sen wrote: I thought -patches was supposed to die. What happened? I was wondering the same thing. Peter? Hmm, let's try this: Anyone who thinks

Re: [PATCHES] still alive?

Marc, care to do the honors? --- Peter Eisentraut wrote: Simon Riggs wrote: On Thu, 2008-09-11 at 15:39 +0300, Peter Eisentraut wrote: Bruce Momjian wrote: Abhijit Menon-Sen wrote: I thought -patches was supposed

Re: [PATCHES] still alive?

On Wed, 1 Oct 2008 20:05:00 -0400 (EDT) Bruce Momjian [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Marc, care to do the honors? KILL IT!! :P --- Peter Eisentraut wrote: Simon Riggs wrote: On Thu, 2008-09-11 at 15:39 +0300,

Re: [PATCHES] still alive?

Bruce Momjian wrote: Marc, care to do the honors? Note: 1. there are several lists to kill, not just pgsql-patches. The database says: pgsql-chat pgsql-benchmarks pgsql-hackers-win32 pgsql-hackers-pitr pgsql-cygwin pgsql-ports 2. The archives must, obviously, survive the kill, and

Re: [PATCHES] still alive?

On Thu, 2008-09-11 at 15:39 +0300, Peter Eisentraut wrote: Bruce Momjian wrote: Abhijit Menon-Sen wrote: I thought -patches was supposed to die. What happened? I was wondering the same thing. Peter? Hmm, let's try this: Anyone who thinks the patches list should remain as separate

Re: [PATCHES] still alive?

--On Donnerstag, September 11, 2008 15:39:01 +0300 Peter Eisentraut [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hmm, let's try this: Anyone who thinks the patches list should remain as separate from hackers, shout now (with rationale)! Seems i've missed something, what's then supposed to hold patches now?

Re: [PATCHES] still alive?

Bernd Helmle wrote: --On Donnerstag, September 11, 2008 15:39:01 +0300 Peter Eisentraut [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hmm, let's try this: Anyone who thinks the patches list should remain as separate from hackers, shout now (with rationale)! Seems i've missed something, what's then supposed

Re: [PATCHES] still alive?

Bernd Helmle wrote: --On Donnerstag, September 11, 2008 15:39:01 +0300 Peter Eisentraut [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Anyone who thinks the patches list should remain as separate from hackers, shout now (with rationale)! Seems i've missed something, what's then supposed to hold patches now? Just

Re: [PATCHES] still alive?

--On Mittwoch, September 17, 2008 22:37:29 +0300 Heikki Linnakangas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Just send them to pgsql-hackers. Oh, that's fine, since discussions are already moved from -patches and are continued there. The only disadvantage i see is that -hackers is a little more frequented

Re: [PATCHES] still alive?

Bruce Momjian wrote: Abhijit Menon-Sen wrote: I thought -patches was supposed to die. What happened? I was wondering the same thing. Peter? Hmm, let's try this: Anyone who thinks the patches list should remain as separate from hackers, shout now (with rationale)! -- Sent via

Re: [PATCHES] still alive?

Abhijit Menon-Sen wrote: I thought -patches was supposed to die. What happened? I was wondering the same thing. Peter? -- Bruce Momjian [EMAIL PROTECTED]http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com + If your life is a hard drive, Christ

[PATCHES] still alive?

I thought -patches was supposed to die. What happened? -- ams -- Sent via pgsql-patches mailing list (pgsql-patches@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-patches