Per Tom comments, attached patch does following:
- Binary I/O support
- Use ActiveSnapshot instead of SerializableSnapshot
- Clarify function purposes
- remove dev targets from Makefile
There should not be any code depending on SerializableSnapshot,
if there is thats a bug that needs fixing. Fi
On 10/11/07, Tom Lane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> "Marko Kreen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Also - either Tom or Jan has changed the code to allow
> > xmin == xmax. Is such case really valid?
>
> Yes, at least in CVS HEAD.
Aha, I had missed that.
Thanks for confirmation.
--
marko
---
"Marko Kreen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Per Tom comments, attached patch does following:
> - Binary I/O support
> - Use ActiveSnapshot instead of SerializableSnapshot
> - Clarify function purposes
> - remove dev targets from Makefile
Applied with some further editorialization.
"Marko Kreen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Also - either Tom or Jan has changed the code to allow
> xmin == xmax. Is such case really valid?
Yes, at least in CVS HEAD.
regards, tom lane
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 5: don'
Per Tom comments, attached patch does following:
- Binary I/O support
- Use ActiveSnapshot instead of SerializableSnapshot
- Clarify function purposes
- remove dev targets from Makefile
There should not be any code depending on SerializableSnapshot,
if there is thats a bug that needs fixing. Fi