On Tue, 2007-07-03 at 09:56 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Neil, according to
> http://developer.postgresql.org/index.php/Todo:PatchStatus
> you have accepted two patches to review --- what is happening with
> those?
Yeah, sorry, forgot about those -- I'll take a look at them tonight.
-Neil
Stefan Kaltenbrunner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Neil Conway wrote:
>> On Mon, 2007-02-07 at 23:13 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
>>> Er, was this on the agenda for 8.3?
>>
>> Well, it seemed fairly harmless to me (no behavioral changes and very
>> little new code, just syntax), so I didn't see a compel
Neil Conway wrote:
> On Mon, 2007-02-07 at 23:13 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
>> Er, was this on the agenda for 8.3?
>
> Well, it seemed fairly harmless to me (no behavioral changes and very
> little new code, just syntax), so I didn't see a compelling reason to
> delay applying it for a few months. But
On Mon, 2007-02-07 at 23:13 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Er, was this on the agenda for 8.3?
Well, it seemed fairly harmless to me (no behavioral changes and very
little new code, just syntax), so I didn't see a compelling reason to
delay applying it for a few months. But I can revert it if you'd pref
Neil Conway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Sun, 2007-07-01 at 12:55 -0700, David Fetter wrote:
>> Here's a new patch + file. This one allows ALTER [SEQUENCE | VIEW] to
>> work only on the respective database objects, but permits the old
>> ALTER TABLE syntax.
> Applied with some fixes. Thanks f
On Sun, 2007-07-01 at 12:55 -0700, David Fetter wrote:
> Here's a new patch + file. This one allows ALTER [SEQUENCE | VIEW] to
> work only on the respective database objects, but permits the old
> ALTER TABLE syntax.
Applied with some fixes. Thanks for the patch. ALTER VIEW ... SET SCHEMA
might b
On Sun, Jul 01, 2007 at 09:03:45PM -0700, Neil Conway wrote:
> On Sun, 2007-01-07 at 12:55 -0700, David Fetter wrote:
> > Here's a new patch + file. This one allows ALTER [SEQUENCE | VIEW] to
> > work only on the respective database objects, but permits the old
> > ALTER TABLE syntax.
>
> How abo
On Sun, 2007-01-07 at 12:55 -0700, David Fetter wrote:
> Here's a new patch + file. This one allows ALTER [SEQUENCE | VIEW] to
> work only on the respective database objects, but permits the old
> ALTER TABLE syntax.
How about taking a look at the more thorough documentation updates Tom
suggested
On Sat, Jun 30, 2007 at 01:48:51AM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Neil Conway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > For the ALTER SEQUENCE case, I think it's also a little weird to
> > have an ALTER SEQUENCE command that modifies some of the
> > properties of a sequence, but not the sequence's name. While that
