John Siracusa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> How does this look? It seems to do what I want without horribly
> breaking anything as far as I can tell.
Not a bad effort for a backend newbie ;-). It was lacking in comments,
and upon inspection I thought it could be generalized a little. I've
appl
Neil Conway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Uh, you get test failures on OS X 10.3.2? On my OS X machine with the
> latest CVS HEAD code, the tests run without any failures.
I was wondering about that too. I get one failure --- a one-liner
zero-versus-minus-zero difference in geometry.out. Anythi
John Siracusa wrote:
How does this look? It seems to do what I want without horribly
breaking anything as far as I can tell. I ran "make check" and got the
same result as I did before my changes (5 failures in OS X 10.3.2).
Uh, you get test failures on OS X 10.3.2? On my OS X machine with the
On 3/3/04 6:53 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
John Siracusa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Given an index like this:
CREATE UNIQUE INDEX i1 ON t1 (c1) WHERE c1 IS NOT NULL;
and a query like this:
SELECT * FROM t1 WHERE c1 = 123;
I'd like the planner to be smart enough to use an index scan using
i1
