"Tom Lane" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote
>
> Is there a point in checking the thread-safety of
> libpq when you can't check the thread-safety of libc?
>
Exactly :-(
Regards,
Qingqing
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 5: don't forget to increase your free
Qingqing Zhou <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> This is half of an item in TODO list. I patch this because now pgbench is
> threaded in Win32, so it is better to check thread safety of libpq.dll.
ISTM this was proposed once before, and rejected on the grounds that
no one could present a convincing use
