Simon Riggs wrote On 12/02/06 06:50,:
Robert, Can you throw any light on this? Or do you have any further
comments on the docs?
http://developer.postgresql.org/pgdocs/postgres/dynamic-trace.html
Here is what the dtrace man page says about the -32 and -64 flags:
The D compiler
Simon Riggs wrote:
Enclose new trace.sgml file as discussed on -docs.
I have a question here, regarding this:
To include DTrace support in a 64-bit binary, specify --enable-dtrace
and DTRACEFLAGS=-64 to configure.
The dtrace documentation says that dtrace automatically picks the right
Simon Riggs [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
This includes refactoring of some of the trace related GUC docs from
config.sgml, so its all in the one place.
Why exactly is that a good idea? Since DTrace is Solaris-only, this
almost seems like an attempt to hide non-Solaris-specific information
where
Simon Riggs a écrit :
Enclose new trace.sgml file as discussed on -docs.
This includes some heavily rewritten words and mostly verbatim programs
from http://blogs.sun.com/robertlor/entry/user_level_dtrace_probes_in,
as invited to do by Josh Berkus and Robert Lor on 27 Nov in private
Simon Riggs [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Enclose new trace.sgml file as discussed on -docs.
After some thought I decided it's probably best to stick this into
monitoring.sgml for now. If it gets big enough to deserve its own
chapter we can think about where else to put it.
Committed with some
On Sat, 2006-12-02 at 01:02 +0100, Guillaume Lelarge wrote:
Simon Riggs a écrit :
Enclose new trace.sgml file as discussed on -docs.
This includes some heavily rewritten words and mostly verbatim programs
from http://blogs.sun.com/robertlor/entry/user_level_dtrace_probes_in,
as invited
On Fri, 2006-12-01 at 18:56 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
Simon Riggs [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
This includes refactoring of some of the trace related GUC docs from
config.sgml, so its all in the one place.
Why exactly is that a good idea?
All of the trace options that require code edits to
On Fri, 2006-12-01 at 19:44 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
Simon Riggs [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Enclose new trace.sgml file as discussed on -docs.
After some thought I decided it's probably best to stick this into
monitoring.sgml for now. If it gets big enough to deserve its own
chapter we can
On Fri, 2006-12-01 at 19:44 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
Simon Riggs [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Enclose new trace.sgml file as discussed on -docs.
Committed with some rewording and SGML fixes.
Looks like you removed this line
@commit[Abort] = count();
which means you should also remove
Oh, seems like Tom got it into CVS. Good.
---
Simon Riggs wrote:
Enclose new trace.sgml file as discussed on -docs.
This includes some heavily rewritten words and mostly verbatim programs
from
Also, it is probably too late to add something of this magnitude this
close to wrapping the tarball, but I might be mistaken.
---
Tom Lane wrote:
Simon Riggs [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
This includes refactoring of some of
11 matches
Mail list logo
