From: "Tom Lane" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> What is the point of this? It seems to be complicating life to little
> purpose (except storing passwords that will fail in non-MD5 password
> methods --- given that people are talking about replacing MD5, that
> doesn't seem like a good forward-looking idea
"Hiroshi Saito" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I may be quite persistent.:-)
> I seasoned the proposal method. It was very painful that the
> conventional connection method to this password was a plain text.
> Although I am simple, I desire the support. Furthermore, the relation
> between a field
