Re: [PATCHES] SLRU_BLCKSZ

2006-05-17 Thread Simon Riggs
On Wed, 2006-05-17 at 10:05 -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > Simon Riggs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Code changes to separate out the symbol for SLRU_BLCKSZ from standard > > BLCKSZ. Same reasons as for doing this for XLOG_BLCKSZ. > > Have you done any benchmarking that shows this is a good idea? Som

Re: [PATCHES] SLRU_BLCKSZ

2006-05-17 Thread Tom Lane
Simon Riggs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Code changes to separate out the symbol for SLRU_BLCKSZ from standard > BLCKSZ. Same reasons as for doing this for XLOG_BLCKSZ. Have you done any benchmarking that shows this is a good idea? My own thoughts on the subject have been along the line that pag