On Wed, Feb 22, 2006 at 06:50:32PM -0600, Jim C. Nasby wrote:
> Ok, here's some *Uber Ugly* code I hacked together to do something
> similar for a potential book project. It's based loosely on docbook.
Ok, no, for real this time... it's at http://jim.nasby.net/sgmlcode/
Thanks to all that pointed
On Fri, Jan 06, 2006 at 04:46:26PM +1300, Mark Kirkwood wrote:
> Jim C. Nasby wrote:
> >On Fri, Jan 06, 2006 at 02:00:34PM +1300, Mark Kirkwood wrote:
> >
> >>However, I think the actual change is not quite right - after running
> >
> >
> >DOH! It would be good if doc/src had a better mechanism fo
Patch applied to HEAD and 8.1.X. Thanks.
---
Jim C. Nasby wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 06, 2006 at 02:00:34PM +1300, Mark Kirkwood wrote:
> > However, I think the actual change is not quite right - after running
>
> DOH! It would
Mark Kirkwood wrote:
> Yes it would - I usually build the SGML -> HTML, then cut the code out
> of a browser session to test - the pain is waiting for the docs to build.
FWIW, what I do is to build a cut-down version of postgres.sgml to
include only the file you want to check. I think there is
Mark Kirkwood wrote:
Jim C. Nasby wrote:
On Sun, Jan 08, 2006 at 04:13:01PM +1300, Mark Kirkwood wrote:
What happens if someone deletes the row between the failed insert and
the second update? :)
In this example the rows in the summary table never get deleted by
DELETE operations on that
Jim C. Nasby wrote:
On Sun, Jan 08, 2006 at 04:13:01PM +1300, Mark Kirkwood wrote:
After re-examining the original code, it looks like it was not actually
vulnerable to a race condition! (it does the UPDATE, then if not found
will do an INSERT, and handle unique violation with a repeat of the
On Sun, Jan 08, 2006 at 04:13:01PM +1300, Mark Kirkwood wrote:
> After re-examining the original code, it looks like it was not actually
> vulnerable to a race condition! (it does the UPDATE, then if not found
> will do an INSERT, and handle unique violation with a repeat of the same
> UPDATE -
Mark Kirkwood wrote:
Jim C. Nasby wrote:
On Fri, Jan 06, 2006 at 02:00:34PM +1300, Mark Kirkwood wrote:
However, I think the actual change is not quite right - after running
DOH! It would be good if doc/src had a better mechanism for handling
code; one that would allow for writing the cod
Jim C. Nasby wrote:
On Fri, Jan 06, 2006 at 02:00:34PM +1300, Mark Kirkwood wrote:
However, I think the actual change is not quite right - after running
DOH! It would be good if doc/src had a better mechanism for handling
code; one that would allow for writing the code natively (so you don't
On Fri, Jan 06, 2006 at 02:00:34PM +1300, Mark Kirkwood wrote:
> However, I think the actual change is not quite right - after running
DOH! It would be good if doc/src had a better mechanism for handling
code; one that would allow for writing the code natively (so you don't
have to worry about tr
Jim C. Nasby wrote:
http://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/static/plpgsql-trigger.html
example 36-4 has a race condition in the code that checks to see if a
row exists. It should use the code from example 36-1. This patch fixes
that. It also adds some commands to show what the summary table outpu
11 matches
Mail list logo
